Få den hjælp, som du har brug for

Lær af tusindvis andre der har arbejdet med programmet. Se denne VIDEO hvis du har brug for hjælp til at få startet.

Dagens vigtigste diskussioner

logo

Happy New Year

Timbo637

2025-01-02 9:37 AM

Medlemsgruppe rygning

logo

New Year Approaching Fast

Timbo637

2024-12-14 1:53 PM

Medlemsgruppe rygning

logo

11 years and counting

Timbo637

2024-10-31 6:49 AM

Medlemsgruppe rygning

logo

Feels like hell week all over!!

Timbo637

2024-10-30 9:38 AM

Medlemsgruppe rygning

Denne måneds Førende:

Mest Hjælpsomme

Fik flest Hjerter

Browse gennem 411.770 emner i 47.068 indlæg

161.410 medlemmer

Velkommen til vores nye medlemmer: blackwidow, Hvogel95, Hellas, Foxtrot0104, Hannemor

Employers billing employees who are unhealthy!


for 17 år siden 0 42 logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo 0
of course the end of this road leads to hiring based on DNA. I heard about a business in Michigan that gave employees 6 months to quit or be fired and did just that and got away with it. Thankfully its still illegal to discriminate like this is Canada as we can refuse a test, but i'm sure the writing is on the wall... [B]My Milage:[/B] [B]My Quit Date: [/B]9/1/2007 [B]Smoke-Free Days:[/B] 66 [B]Cigarettes Not Smoked:[/B] 1,650 [B]Amount Saved:[/B] $528.00 [B]Life Gained:[/B] [B]Days:[/B] 9 [B]Hrs:[/B] 4 [B]Mins:[/B] 26 [B]Seconds:[/B] 21
  • Quit Meter

    $125,016.15

    Amount Saved

  • Quit Meter

    Days: 8196 Hours: 21

    Minutes: 47 Seconds: 40

    Life Gained

  • Quit Meter

    45668

    Smoke Free Days

  • Quit Meter

    685,020

    Cigarettes Not Smoked

for 17 år siden 0 3207 logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo 0
Yay Incentives!!! Boo Penalties!!! [B]My Milage:[/B] [B]My Quit Date: [/B]3/22/2007 [B]Smoke-Free Days:[/B] 229 [B]Cigarettes Not Smoked:[/B] 9,160 [B]Amount Saved:[/B] $1,557.20 [B]Life Gained:[/B] [B]Days:[/B] 31 [B]Hrs:[/B] 23 [B]Mins:[/B] 19 [B]Seconds:[/B] 54
for 17 år siden 0 8760 logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo 0
Hello to all, Such a downstream approach! Very sad indeed. Although Brenna is correct, employers are seeking to get their employees smoke free to cut costs and increase productivity, offering an incentive as opposed to a penalty may be a better approach. Assuring the ressources are available to aid the employee is also equally important as some conditions like blood glucose and cholesterol are inherited and cannot be controlled regardless of changes made to lifestyle. Danielle, Bilingual Support Specialist
for 17 år siden 0 1148 logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo 0
The cost of health care in the US is nearly unreachable! It's not just being able to afford the smokes anymore. Many of our businesses can't remain competitive because of this expense. Many of our citizens don't receive adequate health care because of this expense. This must be a knee-jerk reaction by a few desperate businesses that our honorable and balanced media have chosen to highlight fully in perspective. Our energies would be best focused on helping people quit in the short term and helping them stay quit in the long term. That other monster will take care of itself. [B]My Milage:[/B] [B]My Quit Date: [/B]3/15/2007 [B]Smoke-Free Days:[/B] 236 [B]Cigarettes Not Smoked:[/B] 4,720 [B]Amount Saved:[/B] $991.20 [B]Life Gained:[/B] [B]Days:[/B] 38 [B]Hrs:[/B] 0 [B]Mins:[/B] 52 [B]Seconds:[/B] 8
for 17 år siden 0 1356 logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo 0
Brenna, I have to say, while your statement may indeed be correct, so is John's, from the source he quoted. His post referred directly to that article and wasn't meant to encompass all reasons why employers do these things, but certainly in my opinion doesn't mean that more research is required on his part in order to quote bit from an article. Regardless, his point and that article are clear - 1984 is not so far in the past. Sue [B]My Milage:[/B] [B]My Quit Date: [/B]5/3/2007 [B]Smoke-Free Days:[/B] 186 [B]Cigarettes Not Smoked:[/B] 1,860 [B]Amount Saved:[/B] $325.50 [B]Life Gained:[/B] [B]Days:[/B] 17 [B]Hrs:[/B] 17 [B]Mins:[/B] 44 [B]Seconds:[/B] 39
for 17 år siden 0 519 logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo 0
Employers who bill employees who they deem to be unhealthy just want a hand in their employees pockets. That's all it is. It's the modern day version of the company store. They give and then start taking back. What happens when the fines start exceeding a low level employees wages? Your cholesterol is too high. You had a cigarette, a glass of wine at lunch or last night's dinner, you sprained an ankle roller skating, the list of unhealthy is very very long. Do you wear perfume, deodorant, hair spray? Do you have a pet? That cat hair clinging to your sweater might very well be a health hazard, to you or someone else. It's ridiculous. [B]My Milage:[/B] [B]My Quit Date: [/B]1/27/2007 [B]Smoke-Free Days:[/B] 282 [B]Cigarettes Not Smoked:[/B] 8,460 [B]Amount Saved:[/B] $2,820.00 [B]Life Gained:[/B] [B]Days:[/B] 37 [B]Hrs:[/B] 2 [B]Mins:[/B] 28 [B]Seconds:[/B] 5
for 17 år siden 0 115 logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo 0
How stupid. This kind of negative campain mght help some people with their quit- or make never-smokers think their hepling me- but it does the contrary: make me want to rebel and smoke 5no, I won't start again- but maybe I could make a fake picture of me smoking on photoshop just to spite these employers.. I'd prefer a smoker with a great attitude to a cranky, witless non-smoker. Einstein, JFK, Sartre, Derrida, Jung, Orson Wells, Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, etc etc. I'd urge them to stop- but hey, Einstein, I'd have employed you anytime ! ;) [B]My Milage:[/B] [B]My Quit Date: [/B]10/17/2007 [B]Smoke-Free Days:[/B] 19 [B]Cigarettes Not Smoked:[/B] 323 [B]Amount Saved:[/B] �74.29 [B]Life Gained:[/B] [B]Days:[/B] 1 [B]Hrs:[/B] 11 [B]Mins:[/B] 53 [B]Seconds:[/B] 7
for 17 år siden 0 1153 logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo 0
John_in_NC, Sounds like you have a bit more research to do as to why companies are doing this. Research has shown that the some lifestyle habits can decrease an individuals productivity in the work place. It sounds to me like employers are trying to screen their workers to increase productivity. All the better that everyone here is quitting or quit and doesn't have to worrry about that anymore. Brenna Bilingual Health Educator
for 17 år siden 0 1093 logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo 0
Sounds like discrimination to me. I thought there were laws against that. If it happened to me, I'd fight it! [B]My Milage:[/B] [B]My Quit Date: [/B]8/25/2007 [B]Smoke-Free Days:[/B] 71 [B]Cigarettes Not Smoked:[/B] 2,130 [B]Amount Saved:[/B] $415.35 [B]Life Gained:[/B] [B]Days:[/B] 6 [B]Hrs:[/B] 9 [B]Mins:[/B] 9 [B]Seconds:[/B] 13
for 17 år siden 0 3541 logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo logo 0
If I were an alcoholic or a crack addict, my employer would pay for an expensive rehab facility & I would get 75% of my salary while I was there. I could go there 3 times before there would ever be any talk of firing me because of an addiction affecting my work. Smoking? They make the SSC a website that we're allowed to access during work hours. We don't get tested for nicotine, but it's made plain that a smoker is considered a less valuable, less productive employee than a non-smoker. Until niocotine is illegal and there are employer or government paid programs to help people beat the addiction, it is completely unfair to test for it & certainly unfair to discriminate against its users. [B]My Milage:[/B] [B]My Quit Date: [/B]5/13/2007 [B]Smoke-Free Days:[/B] 175 [B]Cigarettes Not Smoked:[/B] 3,500 [B]Amount Saved:[/B] $1,925.00 [B]Life Gained:[/B] [B]Days:[/B] 17 [B]Hrs:[/B] 12 [B]Mins:[/B] 9 [B]Seconds:[/B] 18

Læser dennne tråd: